Close Go back Collapse all sections
Process Data set: Cembrit decorative fiber cement facade cladding - Cembrit Patina Rough (en) en da

Key Data Set Information
Location RER
Reference year 2021
Name
Cembrit decorative fiber cement facade cladding - Cembrit Patina Rough
General comment on data set Cembrit fibre cement decorative rain screen claddings for mounting on facades or roofs on wooden or metal substructures with the principle of back-ventilated curtain facades. 1 m2 facade board with a thickness of 8mm.
Copyright Yes
Owner of data set
Quantitative reference
Reference flow(s)
Time representativeness
Data set valid until 2026
Technological representativeness

Indicators of life cycle

IndicatorDirectionUnit Production
A1-A3
Transport
A4
Installation
A5
Use
B1
Maintenance
B2
Repair
B3
Replacement
B4
Refurbishment
B5
Operational energy use
B6
Operational water use
B7
De-construction
C1
Transport
C2
Waste processing
C3
Disposal
C4
Recycling Potential
D
Input
  • 17.3
  • 1.32
  • -0.329
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.00575
  • 0.0707
  • 0
  • 0.314
  • 0
Input
  • 19.6
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 17.3
  • 1.32
  • -0.329
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.00575
  • 0.0707
  • 0
  • 0.314
  • 0
Input
  • 1.2E+2
  • 22.9
  • -0.725
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0998
  • 1.23
  • 0
  • 2.4
  • 0
Input
  • 1.46
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
Input
  • 1.2E+2
  • 22.9
  • -0.725
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0998
  • 1.23
  • 0
  • 2.4
  • 0

IndicatorUnit Production
A1-A3
Transport
A4
Installation
A5
Use
B1
Maintenance
B2
Repair
B3
Replacement
B4
Refurbishment
B5
Operational energy use
B6
Operational water use
B7
De-construction
C1
Transport
C2
Waste processing
C3
Disposal
C4
Recycling Potential
D
  • 0.0307
  • 0.00191
  • -0.0000667
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.000038
  • 0.000106
  • 0
  • 0.00131
  • 0
  • 7.28E-8
  • 3.14E-16
  • -5.35E-16
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 1.37E-18
  • 1.68E-17
  • 0
  • 6.77E-16
  • 0
  • 0.000297
  • 0.00000521
  • -1.86E-7
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 2.27E-8
  • 2.79E-7
  • 0
  • 3.13E-7
  • 0
  • 0.00722
  • 0.000572
  • -0.00000964
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0000176
  • 0.0000325
  • 0
  • 0.000337
  • 0
  • 0.0777
  • 0.00681
  • -0.0000386
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.000195
  • 0.000386
  • 0
  • 0.0037
  • 0
  • -0.244
  • 0.0184
  • 0.0202
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • -0.000341
  • 0.000985
  • 0
  • -0.0145
  • 0
  • 10.4
  • 1.69
  • 0.0624
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.00776
  • 0.0905
  • 0
  • 0.182
  • 0
  • 0.00989
  • 0.0139
  • -0.0000107
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0000603
  • 0.000742
  • 0
  • 0.000525
  • 0
  • 10.2
  • 1.72
  • 0.0826
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.00748
  • 0.0922
  • 0
  • 0.169
  • 0
  • 0.0205
  • 0.00157
  • -0.0000241
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0000493
  • 0.0000877
  • 0
  • 0.00102
  • 0
  • 14.9
  • 0.0167
  • 0.00548
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0000727
  • 0.000893
  • 0
  • 0.0191
  • 0

IndicatorUnit Production
A1-A3
Transport
A4
Installation
A5
Use
B1
Maintenance
B2
Repair
B3
Replacement
B4
Refurbishment
B5
Operational energy use
B6
Operational water use
B7
De-construction
C1
Transport
C2
Waste processing
C3
Disposal
C4
Recycling Potential
D
1This impact category deals mainly with the eventual impact of low dose ionizing radiation on human health of the nuclear fuel cycle. It does not consider effects due to possible nuclear accidents, occupational exposure nor due to radioactive waste disposal in underground facilities. Potential ionizing radiation from the soil, from radon and from some construction materials is also not measured by this indicator.
2The results of this environmental impact indicator shall be used with care as the uncertainties on these results are high or as there is limited experiences with the indicator.
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for ecosystems (ETP-fw) 2
  • 85.4
  • 17.1
  • -0.203
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0744
  • 0.914
  • 0
  • 1.37
  • 0
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for humans - cancer effects (HTP-c) 2
  • 2.14E-9
  • 3.53E-10
  • -6.82E-12
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 1.54E-12
  • 1.89E-11
  • 0
  • 2.03E-10
  • 0
Potential Comparative Toxic Unit for humans - non-cancer effects (HTP-nc) 2
  • 1.41E-7
  • 1.79E-8
  • -2.1E-10
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 9.01E-11
  • 9.59E-10
  • 0
  • 2.23E-8
  • 0
Potential Human exposure efficiency relative to U235 (IRP) 1
  • 0.826
  • 0.00624
  • -0.0115
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0000271
  • 0.000334
  • 0
  • 0.0028
  • 0
Potential Soil quality index (SQP) 2
  • 69
  • 8.02
  • -0.741
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0.0349
  • 0.429
  • 0
  • 0.499
  • 0
Potential incidence of disease due to PM emissions (PM) 2
  • 3.57E-7
  • 1.29E-8
  • -3.49E-10
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 4.28E-10
  • 7.02E-10
  • 0
  • 1.62E-8
  • 0